Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 14 May 2002 11:50:07 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: diff and diff-utils in category base
Message-ID:	<20020514155007.GE25899@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C60B1 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C60B1@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Any reason why diff and diff-utils are in the 'base' category?
>
>They seem much more 'devel' to me.

I assume you've sent a similar query to the Debian people.

cgf

- Raw text -