delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Fri, 03 May 2002 09:34:28 -0400 |
From: | Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net> |
Subject: | Re: rebasing new packages?! |
In-reply-to: | <3CD1DDA8.60907@ece.gatech.edu> |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-followup-to: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-id: | <20020503133428.GD3216@tishler.net> |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.24i |
References: | |
<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5F9A AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> | |
<3CD1DDA8 DOT 60907 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> |
Chuck, On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:45:28PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > however, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to refactor it away from STL > and just use "basic" libstdc++ stuff, right? I mean, Jason didn't go > absolutely template-crazy, did he? No, actual my (initial) rebase patch does not use templates at all. BTW, while I was flying to CA on a business trip a few weeks ago, I started to refactor my free_list and used_list classes to use a (STL-like) set template class. I was doing pretty good until I got to iterators... Nevertheless, every minute that I spent on reimplementing STL functionality just felt plain wrong. There is no way that I could (re)implement anything close to the quality of an STL container class. Jason
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |