Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CD1DDA8.60907@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 02 May 2002 20:45:28 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
CC:	Stipe Tolj <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de>, cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: rebasing new packages?!
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5F9A AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>

Robert Collins wrote:


> 
> Yes, and at that point we had two issues:
> 1) We couldn't use libstdc++, let alone the STL. The STL still isn't
> available - beyond whats in libg++-3.
> 2) I think that Jason's design needed some tweaking.


Well, now libstdc++ is allowed, right? (assuming you can find and 
install one, since nobody's stepped forward with mingwlibs-for-cygwin 
package).

Not having looked at Jason's code, I can't comment on the design; 
however, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to refactor it away from STL 
and just use "basic" libstdc++ stuff, right?  I mean, Jason didn't go 
absolutely template-crazy, did he?

Or am I showing my ignorance again?

--Chuck

- Raw text -