Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: move texmf-* out of test?
References:	<m34rit5aj1 DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
	<3CAB28BA DOT 5090600 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Organization:	Jan at Appel
From:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:47:50 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<3CAB28BA.5090600@ece.gatech.edu> (Charles Wilson's message of
	"Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:07:22 -0500")
Message-ID:	<m34ris3c8p.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
Lines:	23
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2
	(powerpc-debian-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version:	1.0

Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> writes:

>> As tetex-beta-20001218-4 (now in curr) and texmf-*-20000804-2 seem to
>> work well together, can we remove the test marker from texmf?
>
> You are the maintainer; it is your decision.
>
> I don't know of any hard rule about "three weeks" -- whatever you, as
> the maintainer, think is appropriate for your packages, is good.

Indeed, I reread setup.html; must have dreamt it up.  But how do I go
about moving texmf-* to curr?  Would this asking here be enough?

No big problems have shown up, it seems a waste to release a new
version (-3) of such a large package (~30mb binaries, 30mb sources)
without major changes.

Greetings,
Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org

- Raw text -