Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2002/03/29/19:19:04
> >And I'm not interested in using the GNU tools anymore on Cygwin,
> >I have the AT&T tools now. I'm using them on SunOS, HP-UX, U/Win and
> >now on Cygwin, too.
> That's fine, but you realize that this sort of runs counter
> to the purpose of the Cygwin project, right?
Hmm, maybe I see the Cygwin project from another POV.
The Cygwin kernel is most important, the tools users choose are another
> >I don't know how many people out there would be using them,
> though. Of
> >course they are _not_ a requirement for ksh. I wonder what made you
> >think that?
> Scan your eyes upwards to the subject. Notice the lack of plural.
I'm aware of that.
Maybe we should change the subject line.
> You did mention packages in your email but you still kept
> referring to the whole thing as a "package".
The original AT&T thing is a single package.
> Regardless, this isn't what I was asking for. I just asked
> you if you could support ksh. I wasn't expecting a whole
> slew of other things as part of the deal.
OK, I'll support ksh. Nothing else. Not even the stub executables.
- Raw text -