delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Reply-To: | <K DOT Fleischer AT omnium DOT de> |
From: | "Karsten Fleischer" <Karsten DOT Fleischer AT gmx DOT de> |
To: | <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: How to create a ksh93 package... |
Date: | Sat, 30 Mar 2002 01:10:40 +0100 |
Organization: | Omnium Software Engineering |
Message-ID: | <00f501c1d77f$5393fb30$f20114d5@muffin> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <20020329175705.GE2505@redhat.com> |
X-MIMEOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 |
Importance: | Normal |
> >And I'm not interested in using the GNU tools anymore on Cygwin, since > >I have the AT&T tools now. I'm using them on SunOS, HP-UX, U/Win and > >now on Cygwin, too. > > That's fine, but you realize that this sort of runs counter > to the purpose of the Cygwin project, right? Hmm, maybe I see the Cygwin project from another POV. The Cygwin kernel is most important, the tools users choose are another thing. > >I don't know how many people out there would be using them, > though. Of > >course they are _not_ a requirement for ksh. I wonder what made you > >think that? > > Scan your eyes upwards to the subject. Notice the lack of plural. I'm aware of that. Maybe we should change the subject line. > You did mention packages in your email but you still kept > referring to the whole thing as a "package". The original AT&T thing is a single package. > Regardless, this isn't what I was asking for. I just asked > you if you could support ksh. I wasn't expecting a whole > slew of other things as part of the deal. OK, I'll support ksh. Nothing else. Not even the stub executables. Karsten
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |