Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:43:10 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: more and base
Message-ID:	<20020329174310.GC2505@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008ABEB AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3CA49069 DOT 9070209 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3CA49069.9070209@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 11:03:53AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Robert Collins wrote:
>
>
>>>> Can we remove more from base?
>>>>
>>> More is what? 3k? I'd love to have had it in the base install  when
>>>  I installed my cygwin -
>>>
>>
>> I support having a pager in the default install (which !=
>> base!!!!!!!)
>
>Base: cygwin is non-functional and completely broken(*) unless each and
>every package in Base is installed.
>
>'more' is not a requirement for a functioning cygwin installation.
>Therefore it shouldn't go in Base.  (Yes, there are a few other packages
>in Base that probably don't belong there, but that's an issue for
>another day).

Ok.  I thought that the consensus was for more to be in Base.  I didn't
think it should go their either but I thought I was the only one arguing
against it.  I've removed it from Base.

cgf

- Raw text -