Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Subject:	RE: Setup/prev/curr/test/metapackages/another screen/etc
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2002 16:11:07 +1100
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008ABC2@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2R5D2o27805

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:40 PM

> It's an interesting idea but I don't like glumping what used 
> to be prev/curr/test with the concept of packages or meta 
> packages.  You lose some functionality that way.

Yes.
 
> I really wish we had never even come up with the concept of 
> prev/curr/test.  Maybe the prev release should be a 
> completely separate release, ditto test.  

Yes. This is how I've been suggesting they get managed for a while now.
Not to the same extent of separation that debian has, but separate.


> test/latest
> test/contrib
> 
> curr/latest
> curr/contrib
> 
> prev/latest
> prev/contrib

I think that the file locations are orthogonal to the versions
considered 'active' in test/curr/prev.

Debian (to use the old example), once had fully separate directories,
but changed to be a single directory structure, with separate indexes -
and those indexes are ~= setup.ini.

Rob

- Raw text -