Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Subject:	RE: prev/curr/test
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:49:06 +1100
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008ABB9@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2QE3M101973

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:29 AM
> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: prev/curr/test
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:01:11AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >cgf wrote:
> >> Ok.  So, this is recent then.  It certainly never allowed it
> >> prior to this. 
> >
> >It -sortof- did. If you *don't have* a setup.ini, then it 
> scanned for 
> >everything..
> 
> I wrote the code.  I know what it did.  There were only three 
> buckets to put things in.  You couldn't go back to revision n 
> - 57 to get older revisions.  I'm not sure why we're arguing 
> about this.

Yes. Sorry - I wasn't meaning to argue per se.

Rob

- Raw text -