delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:10:17 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Keeping base, adding standard. |
Message-ID: | <20020322211017.GA28702@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.23.1i |
Now that we have clickable categories, I think we should consider not making "Base" the default installation, defaulting to something like "Standard" instead. Standard would include things like: base + bzip2 bash clear tcsh less vim telnet ssh cygrunsrv mutt perl? python? shutdown? ssmtp unzip zip The rationale is that people can still select a minimal install with base but still choose a usable setup with Standard. How does this sound? cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |