Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C96DFD2.7010409@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2002 01:50:58 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
CC:	CygWin-Apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: release setup now?
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA760014C54 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>

Robert Collins wrote:


>>2) It seems that when uninstalling (or upgrading), if the uninstalled 
>>package leaves behing a directory that is empty, the directory is not 
>>removed.  Not a big deal, and certainly not a showstopper.
>>
> 
> Hmm, has that behaviour changed? I'll add a TODO for it.


Actually, now that I think about it, this "problem" may be related to 
0x00 problem.  The only packages I noticed this on were local updates of 
the auto-* and libtool* packages that I was testing.

But I had been installing these updates using setup-snapshots.  So all 
of my .lst file had 0x00 -- and then when I tried to upgrade, the 
uninstall didn't work exactly right...

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

--Chuck

- Raw text -