Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<00de01c1a460$bc187660$81293c3e@Obsession>
Reply-To:	<keith_starsmeare AT yahoo DOT co DOT uk>
From:	"keith_starsmeare AT yahoo DOT co DOT uk" <kxs AT breathemail DOT net>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<00b301c1a45e$82614b60$81293c3e AT Obsession> <20020123223901 DOT GA23219 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: setup.exe command line options
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2002 22:52:37 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: setup.exe command line options


> >I'm wondering if I could submit what I have so far, and either leave some
> >bits #ifdef'd out (how does the undefined macro
> >COMMAND_LINE_OPTIONS_FULLY_IMPLEMENTED sound!?) or just miss those bits
out
> >completely from my diff.

> Does it even need to be commented out?  It seems like, if it works
partially,
> we just have a partial implementation.  No need to suffer the bit rot
assocated
> with ifdefs.

For the options that don't work, should I leave in the working getopt code
and take out the broken implementation?

Also, incorrect usage, or --help pops up a window. Should I take that out
completely, ammend it to only include working options, or show all the
options that I wanted to work?

Keith

- Raw text -