Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C453D01.7080705@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:42:41 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Stipe Tolj <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de>
CC:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Apache 1.3.22-3 ready to go?!
References:	<3C43EF02 DOT 239CC44A AT wapme-systems DOT de> <20020115120344 DOT T2015 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3C440FC8 DOT BDBCB655 AT wapme-systems DOT de> <20020115122535 DOT V2015 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020115133314 DOT Y2015 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3C45382F DOT 921ADB4B AT wapme-systems DOT de>

Stipe Tolj wrote:


> BTW, is this going to be released then as package apache-1.3.22-4 or
> do we version back to -1? -- I guess users may be confused and may
> assume there have been 3 previous releases? Anyway I vote for -4,
> otherwise we would break the "respect revision numbers in any case"
> rule.


-4 is fine.  We skip release numbers all the time (or at least I do).  I 
might go thru two or three -REL numbers that are purely for internal use 
and testing, before I ever let anybody on the net see it.

--Chuck

- Raw text -