Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:10:53 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
Message-ID:	<20020111151053.G12057@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<3C3EE6D5 DOT 8916443E AT wapme-systems DOT de> <72101602526 DOT 20020111144934 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C3EF0C4 DOT 8E174E43 AT wapme-systems DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3C3EF0C4.8E174E43@wapme-systems.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 03:03:48PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > Since `httpd' is more general I would prefer `apache'
> > from these two layouts.
> 
> I disagree here! It's common style to have the protocoll name for /etc
> and /var sub-directories.
> 
> BTW, RedHat and SuSE layout look pretty similar.
> 
> Any other opinions from the list?

I agree with your disagreeing here.  It might not be very
concise to have different names for these dirs but it's
"common sense" or so.

However, isn't that postinstall copying superfluous?  Wouldn't
it be better to have the cyghttpd.dll already in usr/bin in
the tar archive?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -