delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2002/01/05/08:26:02

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <113801c195ec$3852de60$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>,
"Cygwin-Apps" <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKGEFECIAA DOT g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Subject: Re: Success report: Setup.exe on Windows 2000.
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 00:23:51 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2002 13:25:54.0224 (UTC) FILETIME=[80688B00:01C195EC]

===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
> Actually now that I take a look, it's much worse than 25% - more like
5%.
> Example: nothing in BASE is showing a description, ash, bash, cygwin,
all the
> way down the line.  The view doesn't appear to matter.

Right. I can reproduce this. I have a suspicion or two - leave it to me.

Rob

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019