delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2001/12/12/12:31:13

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794DE4@exchukthis02.experian.co.uk>
From: "Ebrey, Carl" <Carl DOT Ebrey AT uk DOT experian DOT com>
To: "'cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: FIGlet (again)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:31:04 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:10 PM
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: FIGlet (again)

> Um, the sdesc is still incorrect.  Look at the sdescs at
> http://cygwin.com/packages/.  You should see what I mean.  I rectified
> the description in the setup.hint.

Ah right, thanks.  I've looked and yes, I see where you're coming from.

> The sdesc line is what is displayed by setup.exe.  With the pervious
> layout it would look like something like this:

> figlet		2.2-1		figlet: figlet 2.2 EXPERIMENTAL

> This doesn't explain what figlet does in any way.

True, however in my defense, http://cygwin.com/setup.html isn't the best
when it comes to the sdesc etc.  In all fairness, "sdesc: some text" doesn't
really explain a lot :)  However, like I said, I'll reword setup.html when I
have some time.

> This is why, in the future, I want a corrected setup.hint posted to
> cygwin-apps for discussion.  This is a small enough file that there is
> no need to have a URL posted to it.

Fine with me.  The only reason I posted the URL was because the packages
themselves had changed too and so I was pointing at the whole bundle.

> I'd like at least two maintainers to sign off on the setup.hint before
> the package itself is accepted.

> Consider this a rite of passage.

I never did work out what a rite of passage actually was.  Time to hunt
around the Internet I think :)

Carl


=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.

Experian Limited (registration number 653331).  
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019