Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C17097C.6040104@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 12 Dec 2001 02:38:36 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"Roth, Kevin P." <KPRoth AT MarathonOil DOT com>
CC:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: libtool packages
References:	<6EB31774D39507408D04392F40A10B2BC1FE62 AT FDYEXC202 DOT mgroupnet DOT com>

Roth, Kevin P. wrote:

> For your "stable" release, you might consider rolling in the libtool 
> 1.4.2 patch mentioned in this note 
> (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2001-10/msg00110.html) the 
> allows libtool-ized 'exe's to be installed correctly with a typical 
> `make install`. AFAICT, it's an official patch in the libtool CVS that 
> will be included with 1.4.3 whenever it's released.


Okay, I've put libtool-stable-1.4.2-2 up (with this patch) as well as 
libtool-20010531a-1 (which incorporates the version parsing fix posted 
earlier in an automake thread).

Go here:
   http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/libtool/

No changes to libtool-devel.

--Chuck

- Raw text -