Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Paul G." <pgarceau AT qwest DOT net>
Organization:	Paul G.
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:26:24 -0800
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: gcc -mno-cygwin creates cygwin executables!
Reply-to:	pgarceau AT qwest DOT net
Message-ID:	<3C164FD0.2012.1169C0A@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<3C16B987.EACB76F1@yahoo.com>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01)

On 11 Dec 2001 at 20:57, Earnie Boyd wrote:

> Robert Collins wrote:
> > 
> > What I'd love to see is a supported mingw cross-compiler :}.
> > 
> 
> Give me a week or two, well actually toward the middle of January. 
> It's in the works.  The question I have about this is, once we have a
> grand cross-compiler, should we get rid of -mno-cygwin?

;-)  Can think of some who would love to see the death of -mno-cygwin.

	Phasing it out might be a better option, for as long as there is sufficient documentation and support for the 
cross-compiler.  Flip-side of getting rid of -mno-cygwin is that all those folks who are currently using the switch on a 
regular basis, but who don't see a need to actually download and install Mingw, would likely feel the greatest impact.


	Paul G.

- Raw text -