delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2001/11/28/23:24:07

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <05b101c1788d$774c3750$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <pgarceau AT qwest DOT net>, <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20011128153938 DOT 27245 DOT qmail AT web20008 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <3C04F8A1 DOT 4239 DOT 37B63A AT localhost>
Subject: Re: attn: which, bzip2,gzip maintainers (was Re: some problems with setup.ini)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:22:31 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2001 04:23:56.0605 (UTC) FILETIME=[A91CE6D0:01C1788D]

===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul G." <pgarceau AT qwest DOT net>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: attn: which, bzip2,gzip maintainers (was Re: some problems
with setup.ini)


> Just a thought:
>
> Since I am not sure exactly what was in the original Cygwin (v17/v18)
User
> Package, can we use that package as a model for what is to be
considered "Base"
> category by setup.exe?
>

We could, but I think that 'base' is ok. Some folk want less, some want
more. Base is the intersection of all those needs.

The problem with less, is that currently, base == default install. Now
my suggestion for choosing a 'metapackage' before choosing packages, to
allow for the choice of "full/minimum/developer etc" would change the
default install to be more user friendly. That's been shot down
unfortunately :[.

Anyway, the clickable category all should be done soon (as soon as my
current sandbox is correct, I'll be committing, and then switching to
the categories branch for that stopgap). And we can go back to "install
everything easily".

Rob

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019