Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:49:52 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT Com
Subject:	Re: Category for rxvt [was: Re: attn: which, bzip2,gzip maintainers (was Re: some problems with setup.ini)]
Message-ID:	<20011129024952.GA11448@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT Com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT Com
References:	<NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKGEKGCHAA DOT g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <051001c1787e$ca71e9c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<051001c1787e$ca71e9c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:37:27PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
>>Back in the day, we used to call "GUI presentation managers for the
>>stdin, stdout, stderr, etc", "terminals" or "terminal emulators",
>>didn't we?  Would it make any sense to have a "terminals" category with
>>one entry?  (well, I suppose telnet would qualify too).
>
>I like this.

Well, I think it sucks!

cgf
(We wouldn't want to make it too easy, would we?)

(I actually like the name, too.)

- Raw text -