delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | fixup-Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com@fixme |
From: | "Paul G." <pgarceau AT qwest DOT net> |
Organization: | Paul G. |
To: | CA List <Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com> |
Date: | Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:42:44 -0800 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | Re: attn: which, bzip2,gzip maintainers (was Re: some problems with setup.ini) |
Reply-to: | pgarceau AT qwest DOT net |
Message-ID: | <3C04F7E4.8234.34D74D@localhost> |
In-reply-to: | <3C04EAD3.4225D58F@yahoo.com> |
X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01) |
On 28 Nov 2001 at 8:46, Earnie Boyd wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Earnie Boyd" <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> > > > > > Agreed. Shall we get rid of the separate archivers category? > > > > > > > > fine by me. > > > > > > > > > > Uhm, bzip2, gzip, unzip and zip aren't archivers, they are compression > > > utilities. Tar, mt and ar are archivers. > > > > I know. Your point being? Do you agree that we should get rid of > > 'archivers' or disagree? > > > > The only things in 'archivers' are sharutils, zip and unzip. Once zip > > and unzip are in utils, there's little need for sharutils to be in > > archivers, as all the other archivers are also in utils. > > > > Yes, get rid of it. I agree. Paul G.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |