Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:27:31 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [RFP] misc from cygutils
Message-ID:	<20011128172731.GA4455@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3C032ACF DOT 2040006 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <26215371467 DOT 20011127093129 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C0429FB DOT 335A4A78 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <143300493787 DOT 20011128091011 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C04AA81 DOT 5080804 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3C04AA81.5080804@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:12:33AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
>
>>>>>2) can anybody come up with a better name?  This package is intended to
>>>>>be a grab-bag of simple utilities (each executable requires only a
>>>>>single source code file of moderate length).
>
>>
>>Then maybe 'cygutils' would be a good name?
>
>
>Urk...but I already used that name for my "world-famous" website. <g> 
>Wouldn't that lead to confusion?  Or would it actually be LESS confusing 
> for folks since 'cygutils' == me == the misc package (well, mostly)?
>
>
>>BTW, I want this package, I'm using 'dos2unix' a lot.
>
>That's three! Cool!  (But I still need to wait a few days in case the 
>all-powerful veto appears...)

Booming voice:

I am well pleased with this package.

I think it should be chuckutils, though...

cgf

- Raw text -