Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C04AA81.5080804@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 04:12:33 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [RFP] misc from cygutils
References:	<3C032ACF DOT 2040006 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <26215371467 DOT 20011127093129 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C0429FB DOT 335A4A78 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <143300493787 DOT 20011128091011 AT familiehaase DOT de>

Gerrit P. Haase wrote:


>>>>2) can anybody come up with a better name?  This package is intended to
>>>>be a grab-bag of simple utilities (each executable requires only a
>>>>single source code file of moderate length).

> 
> Then maybe 'cygutils' would be a good name?


Urk...but I already used that name for my "world-famous" website. <g> 
Wouldn't that lead to confusion?  Or would it actually be LESS confusing 
  for folks since 'cygutils' == me == the misc package (well, mostly)?


> BTW, I want this package, I'm using 'dos2unix' a lot.

That's three! Cool!  (But I still need to wait a few days in case the 
all-powerful veto appears...)

--Chuck

- Raw text -