Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	0 vs NULL - a note
From:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<1006910727.637.0.camel@lifelesswks>
References:	<20011127230925 DOT GA5830 AT redhat DOT com>
	<000001c1779c$e1fe2fa0$2101a8c0 AT NOMAD> <20011127235226 DOT GA6537 AT redhat DOT com>
	<1006906033 DOT 2048 DOT 23 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011128002122 DOT GA6919 AT redhat DOT com>
	<1006907495 DOT 2048 DOT 25 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011128005414 DOT GA7118 AT redhat DOT com>
	<1006910727 DOT 637 DOT 0 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
X-Mailer:	Evolution/0.99.2 (Preview Release)
Date:	28 Nov 2001 12:58:41 +1100
Message-Id:	<1006912722.712.2.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	28 Nov 2001 02:00:07.0431 (UTC) FILETIME=[674FB170:01C177B0]

This is simply a FYI for those interested.

http://www.multimania.com/pierret/cpp212.htm
may precende the standard ratification as it still tests for new
returning 0. It makes an excellent point about NULL vs 0 in assignments.

Anyway, for clarity: Both 0 and NULL are acceptable in setup.exe. 

Rob

- Raw text -