Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[203.29.195.129]
From:	"Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<3BF8385F DOT 8010606 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <02a301c17084$9b178b50$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF8B243 DOT 6090200 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <012301c170f2$90ae1990$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Subject:	Re: -src package standard: proposal #5 and #5a
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2001 00:15:57 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID:	<OE128FNpyLAPDVXLuSb000136a3@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	19 Nov 2001 13:15:55.0053 (UTC) FILETIME=[51DC0DD0:01C170FC]

Hi

umm ... Robert, am I reading this wrong or are you agreeing to meta-patches
being ugly?  This kind of points strongly against your own #3 and if so,
what points do you have against #5 ?

Gareth

- Raw text -