Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:55:12 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Apps maintainer -- do you want your name/email address in a public place
Message-ID:	<20011115005512.GD10945@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20011114221729 DOT GA10122 AT redhat DOT com> <3BF2F947 DOT A2D3C3FE AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <058401c16d61$a9e8dbf0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF2FAA6 DOT 81A1C012 AT lapo DOT it> <3BF2FF44 DOT F3B76028 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011114234539 DOT GA10712 AT redhat DOT com> <001201c16d6f$1e1e3c60$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<001201c16d6f$1e1e3c60$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:44:38AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:45 AM
>Subject: Re: Apps maintainer -- do you want your name/email address in a
>public place
>
>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 06:33:24PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> >Lapo Luchini wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Maintainer: Robert Collins <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>> >>
>> >> That's quite a good idea!
>> >> "contact me, but please contact me there"... nice message =)
>> >> I agree on (this form of) "non-public".
>> >
>> >Yeah, this is okay.  But should it be cygwin-apps?
>>
>> Dunno.  cygwin-apps wasn't really intended for bug reports but we
>> could always change that.
>
>I was thinking of setup itself... for other packages cygwin AT cygwin DOT com,
>emacs AT emacs DOT com, mysql-cygwin AT mysql DOT ab etc may be appropriate - ie for
>squid I would put
>Robert Collins <squid-users AT squid-cache DOT org>
>
>If we are just going to push everything via cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, I see no
>point having a 'email' field.

I guess it would be up to the package maintainer to suggest what the
appropriate mail address would be.  I'm not sure that I'd be happy
seeing cygwin users cropping up in gdb AT sources DOT redhat DOT com.

However, I think that in the majority of cases cygwin AT cygwin is the
correct place to post bugs.  It's like in the gcc mailing list when
someone reports a problem with gcc 2.96.47 from Red Hat 7.2.  The
response is always "Talk to Red Hat".

cgf

- Raw text -