Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<034101c16af8$ecb393f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20011111211701 DOT GA23428 AT redhat DOT com> <032f01c16af8$57ff5730$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011111213318 DOT GA23506 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Move zlib up one level, part 2
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:36:28 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	11 Nov 2001 21:42:21.0344 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE321A00:01C16AF9]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> >Yes, you'll screwup Makefile.in, not per tag, but per revision.
>
> Interesting point.  So interesting you needed to make it twice, I
guess.

Sorry, haven't had my morning caffeine yet...

> >> The alternative is to create a new winsup/zlib directory.  I
believe
> >> that would mean that everyone would have to use the -P option when
> >> updating their directories to cause the empty directory to be
> >> automatically deleted.
> >
> >Yes. They'd have to anyway regardless of the way you do the move.
>
> Nope.
>

Oh? If you just mv the dir, what does CVS do in a sandbox if it's run
without -P?

Rob

- Raw text -