Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<20011107004458.70936.qmail@web14506.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:44:58 +1100 (EST)
From:	=?iso-8859-1?q?Danny=20Smith?= <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Re: RFC: Merge native-struct into gcc 3.1
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20011106192207.A8594@redhat.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

 --- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > Did this ever go
anywhere, Danny?
> 

No.  I've not received any feedback from Donn (except the usual "busy"
tone) or anyone else till now.  Specifically Donn was going to confirm or
deny the union-alignment issue.  My head is also emitting a lot of busy
tones lately too.

> Isn't 3.1 going to be frozen RSN?
> 
There's always 3.2.  Seriously, I have given priority to the fastcall work.
Yesterday I  uploaded a beta of gcc-2.95.3 and binutils for mingw (to SF
file release page) with the fastcall support in. Here, with diffs and all
if your interested:

https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2435

I am waiting for some feedback on that (too).  Eric gives me another busy
tone, but I am bugging him relentlessly. I think the fastcall patches will
be easier since they are not so intrusive into generic code as the 
native-struct business. (Donn's already had two goes at gcc-patches) 

buzzz--buzzz--buzzz--
Danny



http://briefcase.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Briefcase
- Manage your files online.

- Raw text -