Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<20010921024950.63785.qmail@web14509.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:49:50 +1000 (EST)
From:	=?iso-8859-1?q?Danny=20Smith?= <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Fwd: Re: [Refresh]: patch for C++ parser bug with function attributes
To:	mingw-dvlpr <mingw-dvlpr AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net>,
	cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

 --- "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> wrote: > Date: Fri, 21 Sep
2001 02:34:52 +0100 (BST)
> From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
> To: Danny Smith <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>
> CC: GCC Patches <gcc-patches AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org>
> Subject: Re: [Refresh]: patch for C++ parser bug with function
> attributes
> 
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Danny Smith wrote:
> 
> > This refreshes  Bob Wilson's patch 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-01/msg01751.html
> > which I quote:
> > 
> > <begin quote>
> > 
> > The attached GCC patch fixes a previously reported problem with
> > function
> > attributes (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/1999-07/msg00835.html). 
> 
> I hope this problem is now fixed on the mainline with my table-driven
> attributes patch.  Could you test this?
> 
> If it is fixed, could you produce a minimal testcase for the problem
> (fails before, passes now) that is suitable to go in the GCC
> testsuite?
> 
> -- 
> Joseph S. Myers
> jsm28 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk
>  

Joseph's patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-09/msg00774.html

I will start on this. Any interest in backport to 3.0.1, or should I
just target 3.1?  I'm hoping it may solve some of the other attribute
problems (stdcall and dllimport) in C++ classes with 3.0.1. 

Danny


http://travel.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Travel
- Got Itchy feet? Get inspired!

- Raw text -