Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2001 22:04:05 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [RFD] ncurses update
Message-ID:	<20010918220405.A11104@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F194 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F194@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:57:07AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:39 AM
>> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
>> Subject: Re: [RFD] ncurses update
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:56:32PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> >I'm thinking of the following (Chris, will the setup.ini generator 
>> >script be able to figure this out?:)
>> >
>> >latest/ncurses/ncurses-5.2-6.tar.bz2
>> >latest/ncurses/ncurses-5.2-6-src.tar.bz2
>> >latest/ncurses/ncurses-5.2.5.tar.gz
>> >latest/ncurses/ncurses-5.2-5-src.tar.gz
>> >latest/ncurses/libncurses5/libncurses5-5.2-1.tar.bz2
>     1      2         3                4
>> >latest/ncurses/libncurses5/libncurses5-5.2-1-src.tar.bz2
>> >latest/ncurses/libncurses6/libncurses6-5.2-1.tar.bz2
>> >latest/ncurses/libncurses6/libncurses6-5.2-1-src.tar.bz2
>> >latest/terminfo/terminfo-5.2-1.tar.bz2
>> >latest/terminfo/terminfo-5.2-1-src.tar.bz2
>> 
>> As I said, I haven't been following this discussion but I don't see
>> anything in the above that is different from the usual directory
>> layout so I don't know why the setup.ini generator wouldn't handle
>> it.
>
>4 path elements, rather than 3 for the libncurses tarballs.

Ok.  I don't know if that will work.  I didn't write the script.

Here's the setup update script:

http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/htdocs/update-setup?rev=1.11&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=cygwin

If you can read perl, you can draw your own conclusions.

cgf

- Raw text -