Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From:	<earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3B9F8E93.4130F2D2@yahoo.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:34:27 -0400
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	CA List <Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-apps AT Cygwin DOT Com
Subject:	Re: Mingw and w32api package names.
References:	<3B9E33C6 DOT B8B10989 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010911115844 DOT B12971 AT redhat DOT com> <3B9E4F56 DOT FF6B92A1 AT yahoo DOT com> <3B9F6038 DOT 36CB9E47 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010912122118 DOT C17887 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:16:40AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >>
> >> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:54:46AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >> > >Shortly I'll be releasing new packages for MinGW and w32api.  The
> >> > >current file name for MinGW isn't really reflective of the package name
> >> > >itself.  I would like to use mingw-runtime-$(VERSION)-$(CYGRELEASE) for
> >> > >the name.  I would also like to use w32api-$(VERSION)-$(CYGRELEASE) for
> >> > >the w32api package name.  This is more consistent with the packaging and
> >> > >is more consistent with the way the packages are distributed by the
> >> > >MinGW team.  Comments or objections?
> >> >
> >> > I'm sure that this it will confuse the current version of setup if you
> >> > call this mingw-runtime.  How are you planning on dealing with the
> >> > changeover?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Adding an entry `@ mingw-runtime' seems to work ok.  It would give
> >> enough time to work out the details of what to do for the `@ mingw'
> >> entry for the next release, e.g.: a post install script to remove
> >> entries from the setup control files in /etc/setup.
> >>
> >
> >Can I assume this to be acceptable?
> 
> setup.ini is generated automatically.  There is no way to just add
> something.  If you are going to be renaming the mingw directory to
> mingw-runtime then I am not sure how setup.exe will deal with that.
> 
> If you are going to be creating a new directory then that means
> there will be a mingw directory sitting around until we somehow
> modify setup to deal with the situation of obsoleting a package.
> 

According to Chuck's response the autoscript will create an `@
mingw-runtime' entry even if the directory is named mingw.  If that is
the case the directory name doesn't need to change.  So the question is,
what does the autoscript really do?  Is it in CVS somewhere I can
download and review?

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- Raw text -