Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From:	<earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3B9F6038.36CB9E47@yahoo.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2001 09:16:40 -0400
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	CA List <Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	CA List <Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com>
Subject:	Re: Mingw and w32api package names.
References:	<3B9E33C6 DOT B8B10989 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010911115844 DOT B12971 AT redhat DOT com> <3B9E4F56 DOT FF6B92A1 AT yahoo DOT com>

Earnie Boyd wrote:
> 
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:54:46AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > >Shortly I'll be releasing new packages for MinGW and w32api.  The
> > >current file name for MinGW isn't really reflective of the package name
> > >itself.  I would like to use mingw-runtime-$(VERSION)-$(CYGRELEASE) for
> > >the name.  I would also like to use w32api-$(VERSION)-$(CYGRELEASE) for
> > >the w32api package name.  This is more consistent with the packaging and
> > >is more consistent with the way the packages are distributed by the
> > >MinGW team.  Comments or objections?
> >
> > I'm sure that this it will confuse the current version of setup if you
> > call this mingw-runtime.  How are you planning on dealing with the
> > changeover?
> >
> 
> Adding an entry `@ mingw-runtime' seems to work ok.  It would give
> enough time to work out the details of what to do for the `@ mingw'
> entry for the next release, e.g.: a post install script to remove
> entries from the setup control files in /etc/setup.
> 

Can I assume this to be acceptable?

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- Raw text -