Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:20:40 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: UMSDOS
Message-ID:	<20010628222040.B3893@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<009b01c0ffc3$bdcce000$806410ac AT local>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<009b01c0ffc3$bdcce000$806410ac@local>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:16:12PM +1000

On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:16:12PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Chris,
>    just how much interest is there in UMSDOS? I've got the programs all
>compiling, I just need to
>1) write a fhandler_umsdos
>2) assign proper ioctl values to the ioctls.
>
>voila.
>
>however - the code I'm working off is understandably GPL'd. I haven't looked
>at the kernel sources (and won't), so the fhandler_ should be ok, as I'm
>creating from scratch there... but what about the utility progs?

I'm not too worried about the utility programs.  I just have to make sure that
their licensing terms are adequately spelled out when we supply a commercial
license.

cgf

- Raw text -