Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:28:02 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	Cygwin-Apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>,
	Cygwin-Xfree <cygwin-xfree AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: accept() failed message on kde 1.1.2 ??
Message-ID:	<20010615112802.B4107@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin-Apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>,
	Cygwin-Xfree <cygwin-xfree AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<7F2B9185F0196F44B59990759B91B1C2505D49 AT ins-exch DOT inspirepharm DOT com> <000001c0f577$dec63960$6e032bb7 AT BRAMSCHE>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<000001c0f577$dec63960$6e032bb7@BRAMSCHE>; from Ralf.Habacker@saght.tessag.com on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:47:55AM +0200

On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:47:55AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> >
> > > > Actually, that is probably Corinna's code.  It sounds like
> > > some kind of
> > > > problem with reusability of the socket.
> > >
> > > The only change we had in the accept() code between 1.1.8 and
> > > 1.3.2 was Egor's patch to support secure connections on AF_UNIX
> > > sockets. Is it possible that the security check fails under
> > > some circumstances here?
> > >
> >
> > There is no security check in X11.
> >
> >
> > > However, a strace containing a failing accept() would perhaps help.
> >
> > Ralf, should be able to send a strace directly to you.
> > Ralf please do not post strace files to the list :-)
> >
> I will try, but the difficulty is that on stracing the error does not
> occure. I will analyze it in more detail ...
> 
> an example
>  [...]

The problem is that we can't see any reason why accept fails.
If it's in fact the Winsock call, we would at least need a
Winsock error code. If it's Egor's additional code we would
see an appropriate message in the strace.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -