Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:38:08 +0100
Message-ID:	<687-Thu05Apr2001103808+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer:	emacs 20.7.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.1
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge]
In-Reply-To:	<3ACB3C89.14063.2B3EFA@localhost>
References:	<3ACB7A00 DOT 969D0FE2 AT yahoo DOT com>
	<3ACB3C89 DOT 14063 DOT 2B3EFA AT localhost>

On Wednesday 4 Apr 01, Paul Garceau writes:
> Hmmm...
> 
> On 4 Apr 2001, at 14:46, the Illustrious Earnie Boyd wrote:
> 
> > So why tsk me?  Chris asked the question.  Obviously the answer is yes,
> > we need a cygwin-apps FAQ-O-MATIC.
> > 
> > Earnie.
> 
> 	Perhaps he doesn't know what a faq-o-matic is...?
> 
> 	At any rate, an example can be found at the gcc main website 
> (www.gnu.org/gcc?).

In the thread associated with the message that Robert cited, I point
out that the GCC F-O-M is a very poor example of how F-O-M should be
used!  That said, I think a Cygwin F-O-M would be a great idea, if
done properly, and I would be willing to convert the existing "user"
FAQ into F-O-M, but I think it would be a lot of work and I don't know
where the time would come from.

Cheers,
David

- Raw text -