Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
To:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>, <autoconf AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: updated win32 macro
References:	<035401c0ac91$3ba21fd0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<022001c0accf$29b724d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<orelvz60mr DOT fsf AT guarana DOT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br>
	<007f01c0ad2e$f3dc5d20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<00a301c0ad32$57ad0220$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<mv4elvz5pma DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr>
	<00c801c0ad36$01ec3370$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<mv466hb5ohw DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr>
	<011a01c0ad41$c0fbc9a0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<mv4snkf43ot DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr>
	<01b801c0ad4b$9b2f1380$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<20010315102922 DOT B1727 AT redhat DOT com>
	<006c01c0ad9d$18618990$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<20010315174916 DOT D6629 AT redhat DOT com>
	<026501c0ada3$3942af80$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<20010315190830 DOT A7841 AT redhat DOT com>
	<034101c0adad$d0f94b40$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<mv4n1ait2ff DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr>
	<010601c0b067$9ab46e90$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
From:	Akim Demaille <akim AT epita DOT fr>
Date:	19 Mar 2001 12:52:15 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<010601c0b067$9ab46e90$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
Message-ID:	<mv4elvut1qo.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr>
Lines:	9
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
MIME-Version:	1.0

>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> writes:

Robert> Wasn't that for the low level interface? Which I've done - it
Robert> defines WIN32FLAGS...

This is fine!  Most people will not want to bother, and having it into
CFLAGS is fine, there is nothing else to do.  And your low level one
gives the means to tune exactly what the user wants.  That's the
perfect balance!

- Raw text -