Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<034101c0adad$d0f94b40$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	<autoconf AT gnu DOT org>
References:	<035401c0ac91$3ba21fd0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks><022001c0accf$29b724d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks><orelvz60mr DOT fsf AT guarana DOT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br><007f01c0ad2e$f3dc5d20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks><00a301c0ad32$57ad0220$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks><mv4elvz5pma DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr><00c801c0ad36$01ec3370$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks><mv466hb5ohw DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr><011a01c0ad41$c0fbc9a0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <mv4snkf43ot DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr> <01b801c0ad4b$9b2f1380$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010315102922 DOT B1727 AT redhat DOT com> <006c01c0ad9d$18618990$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010315174916 DOT D6629 AT redhat DOT com> <026501c0ada3$3942af80$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010315190830 DOT A7841 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: updated win32 macro
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:12:39 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	16 Mar 2001 00:06:48.0817 (UTC) FILETIME=[FEDBC610:01C0ADAC]

Well CFLAGS was the autoconf maintainers suggestion. I think I'll stick
with that, and let any individual maintainer (such as cgf :] ) use the
low level interface if they have a non-ordinary environment.

Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>; <autoconf AT gnu DOT org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: updated win32 macro


> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:56:43AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >So in a nutshell, because some packages change CFLAGS, and others
change
> >CC, we require everyone to change their Makefiles ?
> >
> >I agree that overriding CC is bad - thats why it was changed to
CFLAGS.
> >But CFLAGS is the standard way of changing the compiler behaviour -
why
> >do the makefiles over ride that? And how common a practice is that?
> >
> >In fact, on second thought, packages that override CFLAGS just use
the
> >low level interface
> >AC_PROG_CC_WIN32
> >EXTRA_CFLAGS="$WIN32FLAGS"
>
> I'm sure that the autoconf maintainers have more experience with this
> than I, but IMO relying on overriding of CC and CFLAGS isn't the way
to
> go.  When I first started changing things, I thought I could use this
> technique but I think it is too fragile.
>
> cgf
>

- Raw text -