delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3A1C73C5.DAFD322A@ece.gatech.edu> |
Date: | Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:32:53 -0500 |
From: | Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Texinfo-4.0 |
References: | <20001122224758 DOT 2391 DOT qmail AT web115 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20001122175741 DOT A12681 AT redhat DOT com> |
Christopher Faylor wrote: > However, I'm willing to be swayed on the issue. If everyone else agrees > that changing the default is the right decision, I'll be happy to do it. I'm in favor of removing -DWIN32 / -DWINNT from the specs file for normal gcc compiles (they *would* be defined for -mno-cygwin compiles). However, the real issue is Red Hat's paying cygwin customers -- how would *they* react to this change? --Chuck
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |