Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3D0F9655.3080500@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:21:41 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: RFD: gettext, iconv, packaging...
References:	<3D0F798E DOT 70101 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3D0F7B37 DOT 4000501 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020618210343 DOT V30892 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>

Corinna Vinschen wrote:


> If only these two tools are using cyggettext*.dll and the other one,
> why not linking statically against them?  I don't see a reason to
> have dlls hanging around for that purpose.


No, you got it backwards.  There are only two programs -- the two MAIN 
programs "gettext.exe" and "ngettext.exe" -- that DON'T use the 
cyggettext*.dll code.  There are 6 or so "development" oriented programs 
that DO use the code.  Why include duplicate code in all those programs 
if it can all be stored in a shared library?

--Chuck

- Raw text -