Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: URL paths in setup.exe
From:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	Earnie Boyd <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<3CD7C79A.55D8EA67@yahoo.com>
References:
	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C6006 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
	<3CD7C79A DOT 55D8EA67 AT yahoo DOT com>
Date:	07 May 2002 22:40:34 +1000
Message-Id:	<1020775239.623.0.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	07 May 2002 12:40:39.0459 (UTC) FILETIME=[64ADC730:01C1F5C4]

On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 22:24, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com]

> Fine, but that's still a Cygwin library and doesn't exist in MinGW land.
> I'm making a fuss for search engine sake.  So, please, let's find a
> different way to reference it or I'll be getting questions of "Where can I
> find the cygfile library?" on my MinGW list.

Huh? It's mingw code designed for mingw, and using mingw calls. It won't
build with -mnowin32 on cygwin, and it won't build on posix systems.

It's also not a library per se - it's the io_streams_cygfile.cc and .h
files in the setup source. It isn't visible anywhere else. 

No user should - ever - see cygfile:// as a reference. It's purely for
internal use to differentiate between
user entered paths and
paths we *know* belong in the cygwin file system that we are creating as
we do the install.

I'm open to ideas for renaming, but ... posix:// is wrong (it's not a
posix provider per se - it's a cygwin mounted structure provider). (And
posix:// is the most obvious alternative to cygfile:// for me.)

Rob

- Raw text -