delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3CD297FD.931C9726@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Fri, 03 May 2002 10:00:29 -0400 |
From: | Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> |
Reply-To: | Earnie Boyd <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
CC: | Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: rebasing new packages?! |
References: | <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5FA9 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> |
Robert Collins wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason AT tishler DOT net] > > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:52 PM > > > > As long as the required dependencies are easily satisfied: > > > a) STL headers + any libs for gcc on cygwin (i.e. OOTB build for > > > developers). > > > > Isn't a) already satisfied? > > Possibly. I'm simply setting expectations. > > > > b) STL headers + any libs for gcc -mno-cygwin (i.e. how I > > build, and > > > the documented release build on > > > > Is b) satisfied by the following? > > > http://www.colomsat.net.co/freehost/ngiraldo/cppcygwin.html > > b) is an alternative approach to what I've already documented here. So > it covers libstc++ aka libg++-3. I don't know how much of the STL that > includes (see my earlier email). > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html). > > > c) STL headers + any libs for a linux hosted cross-chain targeting > > > mingw. I.e. how I expected Chris builds. > > > > I don't know how to satisfy c). > > > > If a & b are satisfied with the libg++-3 library and headers, then c) is > trivial.If not then someone needs to check it is doable. As long as rules a && b are followed in rule c then c is doable. Earnie.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |