delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Fri, 29 Mar 2002 08:03:55 -0500 |
From: | Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net> |
Subject: | When to release a threaded Cygwin Python? |
To: | Cygwin-Apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
Mail-followup-to: | Cygwin-Apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
Message-id: | <20020329130355.GA2520@tishler.net> |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.24i |
I would like to release a threaded Cygwin Python. However, I would like to avoid another fiasco like my last PostgreSQL release... :,) Here's the deal. Although a threaded Cygwin Python runs just fine under Cygwin 1.3.10, one cannot build one themselves without the following patch to sys/features.h: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2002/msg00122.html So, should I hold off releasing a new Python until 1.3.11? Or, is it OK to release one now with the appropriate build caveat documented in the README? Thanks, Jason
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |