Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:28:51 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: prev/curr/test
Message-ID:	<20020326132851.GB27571@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008ABB8 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008ABB8@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:01:11AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>cgf wrote:
>> Ok.  So, this is recent then.  It certainly never allowed it 
>> prior to this. 
>
>It -sortof- did. If you *don't have* a setup.ini, then it scanned for
>everything..

I wrote the code.  I know what it did.  There were only three buckets to
put things in.  You couldn't go back to revision n - 57 to get older
revisions.  I'm not sure why we're arguing about this.

cgf

- Raw text -