Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 23 Mar 2002 13:09:16 +0000
Message-ID:	<8864-Sat23Mar2002130916+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer:	21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 7.00 under 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Keeping base, adding standard.
In-Reply-To:	<20020322211017.GA28702@redhat.com>
References:	<20020322211017 DOT GA28702 AT redhat DOT com>

On Friday 22 Mar 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
> Now that we have clickable categories, I think we should consider not
> making "Base" the default installation, defaulting to something like
> "Standard" instead.
> 
> Standard would include things like:
> 
> base +
> bzip2
> bash
> clear
> tcsh
> less
> vim
> telnet
> ssh
> cygrunsrv
> mutt
> perl?
> python?
> shutdown?
> ssmtp
> unzip
> zip
> 
> The rationale is that people can still select a minimal install with
> base but still choose a usable setup with Standard.

Those all look good but I would definitely exclude perl and python
from this list.  They are both quite large.

David

- Raw text -