delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3C8FC440.A05EA121@lapo.it> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:27:28 +0100 |
From: | Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) |
X-Accept-Language: | it,en,fr,es,ja |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | reducing binary distribution size with UPX |
What about reducing distributed exes size using UPX? Has it any side-kicks on cygwni binaries? Of course bz2 archives wouldn't change but installed size could. Just an idea (and I found nothing in the archives regarding it 0=) ). -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |