Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:28:00 -0500
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject:	Re: setup.exe rebase patch
In-reply-to:	<20020227025945.GA26911@redhat.com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<20020228152800.GB952@hp.com>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.24i
References:	<20020207134119 DOT GB1804 AT dothill DOT com>
	<027701c1bd28$c4666170$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020225153441 DOT GA2544 AT hp DOT com>
	<018901c1be4f$6752fbb0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020226212652 DOT GC2288 AT hp DOT com>
	<3C7C491D DOT 7000302 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020227025945 DOT GA26911 AT redhat DOT com>

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:59:45PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> However, I agree that rebasing shouldn't be the default behavior.  In fact,
> I wonder if I should make cygwin non-rebaseable.  It would load faster if
> I did that.

OK.  Then it would be best if you could make cygwin1.dll non-rebaseable.
Otherwise, rebase will have to maintain a blacklist of DLLs too.

I can easily leave a hole for cygwin1.dll (and other DLLs).  However,
the question then becomes how much space should be reserved?  Right now
0x120000 is "needed" -- unfortunately, in the future, more may be needed.
What happens then?

Adding rebase functionality has uncovered more issues than I initially
imagined.  Assistance determining the essential requirements would be
greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Jason

- Raw text -