| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:36:24AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 01:41:13PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >> Robert Collins wrote: >> >Neato. This sounds like a cygutils thingo to me, or a new package. >> >Chuck? Ohhhh Chuck? >> >> Ummm...do we really want to fork the code into two separate locations? > >No, they should somehow share the common code. > >> It seems to me that the best thing to do would be the following: >> >> [snip very reasonable proposal] >> >> Yeah -- which is why they should both come from the same code. In the >> same location. I *strongly* advocate adding rebase.exe to the cinstall >> directory since it will be so tightly tied to setup.exe's behavior... > >cinstall is fine with me. winsup/utils is another possibility. >I'm having problems deciding which is better. I'm willing to go along >with the consensus. Unless, Chris would like to make an executive >decision. :,) The program itself sounds more like something for cygutils than for winsup/utils but if it needs to be tightly integrated with setup.exe, it should probably just live in cinstall. cgf
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |