Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:24:05 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Setup
Message-ID:	<20020224162405.GC17909@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<015a01c1b886$622561b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <VA DOT 00000a82 DOT 00e1d48b AT thesoftwaresource DOT com> <002501c1b8e4$9754b5d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020219040513 DOT GA372 AT redhat DOT com> <009701c1b8fc$a8eedba0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020219044601 DOT GA597 AT redhat DOT com> <01b801c1bd23$0a440720$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<01b801c1bd23$0a440720$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:04:32PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> I don't think that setup.exe should automatically switch to Uninstall
>> in any circumstances unless the package maintainer has specifically
>> indicated that is the correct behavior.  Somehow.
>
>I agree. My point has been (from the beginning) about *where* that
>intent gets indicated.

No, you're not agreeing if you think that a setup.ini file can be
crafted in such a way that an "Uninstall" will show up without the
package maintainer explicitly somehow saying "I want this package to
be uninstalled".  And, not making a test version of a package available
is not "explicit".

cgf

- Raw text -