Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:21:20 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pkgconfig
Message-ID:	<20020224162120.GB17909@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA760014ADE AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3C774EAA DOT 9000204 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <010f01c1bd1f$7b925cf0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<010f01c1bd1f$7b925cf0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:39:04PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>>Well, yeah, me too -- but setup got confused, according to some users,
>>the last time we tried moving packages around (ncurses).  Lets verify
>>that the soon-to-be-released setup can handle moving ONE package
>>(gettext?) before advocating a wholesale rearrangement.  (AND give
>>everybody out there some time to switch from the old 'stable' setup to
>>the new 2.194.2.x one).
>
>What, change control?  Ha!.  Seriously though, setup will handle it
>fine, as package comparison is directory tree context free.  upset
>might be a little though.

upset will handle it.  It doesn't care where stuff is stored.  It makes
no distinction between contrib and latest.

cgf

- Raw text -