Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<063001c1b59e$992b3350$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<011401c1b53b$01de5350$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C6BF704 DOT 2050005 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020214175016 DOT GA2154 AT redhat DOT com> <3C6BFBCE DOT 8060702 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020214180641 DOT GA2244 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: setup w/char* eliminated is big
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:28:50 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	14 Feb 2002 21:28:11.0630 (UTC) FILETIME=[80F848E0:01C1B59E]

===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: setup w/char* eliminated is big


> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:02:54PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Oh -- well, I guess I coulda done that too, but I don't like
> >unilaterally messing with code in someone else's kingdom (but since
> >you're the Grand High Emperor Moppet, it's okay for YOU).  I know
that
> >Robert has had the fix in his local sandbox for two weeks.  I was
just
> >leaving it up to him to commit that fix -- and reminding him to do so
> >before unleashing the new setup.exe upon the world.
>
> I don't feel too bad messing with this particular code since it's
mine,
> I know that I just arbitrarily added a '_' here, and Robert already
> indicated that he'd revert it.

Exactly. Normally I'd have no issue with this. It's just the size of the
patch I'm trying to apply that has prompted meto ask you to revert your
commit.

Rob

- Raw text -