Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:08:17 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
Message-ID:	<20020113170817.A2015@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3C3C8A0E DOT 9000100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020109183309 DOT GB6261 AT redhat DOT com> <024601c1995d$304b3d10$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C41314E DOT 50406 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <05ec01c19c02$d05b0c20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C4137B5 DOT 2000807 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <060001c19c06$097f5080$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C41AEED DOT 2070904 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3C41AEED.2070904@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:59:41AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> IMO, we should either mandate that:
> 
> name field(s) cannot contain '-' so that we ALWAYS only have three 
> '-'delimited fields (four in the case of -src packages), or
> 
> setup/upset will always parse from R to L, so the FINAL two '-'delimited 
> fields will always be considered REL and VER. (or '-src' and REL and VER 
> in the -src case)

This one.  I mean, it works, right?  Why should we change it to
get a less flexible variation?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -